
Boeing 747F vs Antonov AN-124: Cargo Comparison
Detailed technical comparison between the Boeing 747F and Antonov AN-124. Capacity, hold dimensions, loading, costs, and use cases for cargo freight.
The Boeing 747F and Antonov AN-124 are the two giants of global air freight. Each holds a unique position in the cargo industry: the 747F as the versatile workhorse of cargo airlines, and the AN-124 as the champion of oversized and super-heavy freight. This technical comparison provides an in-depth analysis of their capabilities, performance, and respective use cases. The specialists at Private Jets Connect break down the key points below.
Overview of Both Aircraft
Boeing 747F
The Boeing 747 cargo comes in two main versions still in service:
- 747-400F: cargo version of the 747-400, produced from 1993 to 2009
- 747-8F: latest generation, produced from 2011 to 2022
Operated by airlines such as Cargolux, Atlas Air, Korean Air Cargo, and UPS, the 747F is the most widespread freighter in the world for heavy intercontinental cargo.
Antonov AN-124 Ruslan
The Antonov AN-124 Ruslan was designed in the 1980s for the Soviet military. Converted for civil freight, it is operated by Antonov Airlines and a few specialized operators. Its unique design with a rear ramp and nose-opening makes it the reference aircraft for outsize freight.
Detailed Technical Comparison
| Specification | Boeing 747-400F | Boeing 747-8F | Antonov AN-124 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Max. payload | 124 tonnes | 137.7 tonnes | 150 tonnes |
| Hold volume | 600 m3 | 858 m3 | 750 m3 |
| Hold length | 56.4 m | 62.2 m | 36.5 m |
| Hold width | 6.1 m | 6.1 m | 6.4 m |
| Hold height (main deck) | 3.0 m | 3.0 m | 4.4 m |
| Range (max. payload) | 8,230 km | 8,130 km | 4,800 km |
| Range (empty) | 13,450 km | 14,320 km | 11,900 km |
| Cruising speed | 905 km/h | 908 km/h | 800 km/h |
| Engines | 4x CF6-80C2B5F | 4x GEnx-2B67 | 4x D-18T |
| Max. takeoff weight | 412 tonnes | 448 tonnes | 405 tonnes |
| Min. runway length | 3,018 m | 3,100 m | 3,000 m |
| Crew | 2 pilots | 2 pilots | 6 (2 pilots + 4 engineers) |
Loading Systems
Boeing 747F: Standardized Efficiency
The 747F features multiple loading access points:
- Side cargo door (nose-opening on some versions): 3.4 m x 2.5 m
- Main deck: accepts standard pallets and containers (LD3, PMC, ULD)
- Lower deck: additional capacity for bulk freight or containers
- Integrated roller system for rapid mechanized loading
Loading the 747F is standardized and fast: a fully loaded aircraft can be loaded in 1 to 2 hours thanks to roller systems and standard handling equipment available at all international airports.
Antonov AN-124: Unmatched Versatility
The AN-124 offers unique loading flexibility:
- Nose-opening: the entire front section lifts up, creating an opening of 6.4 m x 4.4 m
- Rear ramp: enables roll-on/roll-off loading of vehicles and equipment
- Reinforced floor: supports concentrated loads up to 20 tonnes per linear metre
- Integrated winches: two 10-tonne winches for pulling heavy loads
- Onboard cranes: two 10-tonne cranes for cargo handling inside the aircraft
Loading the AN-124 is more complex and time-consuming (4 to 8 hours) but offers unmatched capability for outsize items.

Advantages of the Boeing 747F
Availability and Network
With over 120 units in service across numerous operators, the 747F is widely available. An aircraft can be found at most global hubs, reducing positioning costs.
Operating Costs
The 747F benefits from lower operating costs thanks to better range, optimized fuel consumption (747-8F), and maintenance standardization.
Range
The 747F offers a range at maximum payload of over 8,000 km, enabling non-stop intercontinental flights. The AN-124, with its 4,800 km range, often requires technical stops on long routes.
Airport Handling
Loading the 747F uses standard equipment available at all international airports. The AN-124 often requires special equipment and longer preparation time.
Advantages of the Antonov AN-124
Payload Capacity
The team at Private Jets Connect has seen growing demand in this segment and continuously adapts its solutions accordingly.
The AN-124 offers a 150-tonne payload, exceeding the 747-8F by 12 tonnes and the 747-400F by 26 tonnes. For very heavy loads, this difference is decisive.
Hold Dimensions
The 4.4 m hold height (versus 3.0 m for the 747F) and 6.4 m width allow loading items impossible to fit in a 747F: complete industrial turbines, assembled helicopters, train cars.
Roll-On/Roll-Off Loading
The nose-opening + rear ramp combination enables end-to-end roll-on loading. Vehicles and equipment can drive directly into the aircraft, eliminating the need for external cranes for many loads.
Reinforced Floor
The AN-124’s floor can support concentrated loads far exceeding those of the 747F, which is critical for heavy and compact items.
Recommended Use Cases
Choose the Boeing 747F for
- Standard freight in large quantities (pallets, ULD containers)
- Long-distance intercontinental routes without stops
- Frequent shipments requiring rapid availability
- Optimized charter budget
- Freight not exceeding 3 metres in height and 6 metres in width
Choose the Antonov AN-124 for
- Oversized freight exceeding 747F dimensions
- Single items weighing over 30 tonnes
- Equipment requiring roll-on loading (ramp)
- Items exceeding 3 metres in height
- Industrial projects with atypical loads

Comparative Charter Costs
| Route | Boeing 747-400F | Boeing 747-8F | Antonov AN-124 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Europe - Middle East | 150,000-250,000 EUR | 180,000-280,000 EUR | 250,000-400,000 EUR |
| Europe - Asia | 250,000-400,000 EUR | 280,000-450,000 EUR | 400,000-600,000 EUR |
| Europe - USA | 200,000-350,000 EUR | 230,000-380,000 EUR | 350,000-500,000 EUR |
| Europe - Africa | 120,000-200,000 EUR | 140,000-230,000 EUR | 200,000-350,000 EUR |
These rates are indicative and vary by availability, aircraft positioning, and market conditions. Request a custom cargo quote for an accurate price.
Making the Right Choice
The decision between 747F and AN-124 often comes down to a simple question: does your freight fit in a 747F? If yes, the 747F will almost always be more economical and quicker to mobilize. If not, the AN-124 is the solution. An experienced cargo broker can quickly assess your freight’s dimensions and weight to recommend the optimal aircraft.
To go further with dedicated support, submit your request to Private Jets Connect.
Frequently Asked Questions
Everything you need to know about our services
Which aircraft carries more cargo, the 747F or the AN-124?
The Antonov AN-124 carries more with a maximum payload of 150 tonnes versus 124 to 137 tonnes for the Boeing 747 (depending on the 400F or 8F version). However, the 747 offers greater cargo hold volume (858 m3 for the 747-8F vs 750 m3 for the AN-124).
Which aircraft is better suited for oversized freight?
The Antonov AN-124 is superior for oversized freight thanks to its rear ramp and nose-opening design enabling roll-on/roll-off loading. Its hold offers a larger cross-section (6.4 m x 4.4 m) than the 747F, allowing larger items to be loaded.
Is the Boeing 747F cheaper than the AN-124?
Yes, chartering a Boeing 747F is generally 30 to 50% cheaper than an AN-124 on the same routes. The 747F benefits from more operators, better availability, and lower operating costs.
Can the AN-124 land at any airport?
The AN-124 requires a runway of at least 3,000 metres and sufficient pavement strength for its 405-tonne takeoff weight. Not all airports can accommodate it, which is a constraint to evaluate with a cargo broker during planning.
How many of each aircraft are in service?
Approximately 120 Boeing 747F aircraft (all versions combined) are in commercial service, while only about ten AN-124s are operational for civil freight. This AN-124 scarcity partly explains its higher charter cost.
Explore air freight by industry and destination
Cargo destinations
Related articles
Need urgent cargo transport?
Our cargo experts are available 24/7 to provide you with a personalized quote within 2h.
Contact : contact@private-jets-connect.com



